Windsor Town Council
Budget Meeting
Council Chambers - Town Hall
April 25, 2001
Approved Minutes
Mayor Hogan called the budget meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
Roll Call - Present: Mayor Hogan, Deputy Mayor Curtis, Council member Albano, Council member Broxterman, Council member Haverstock, Council member Pacino, Council Member Simon, Council member Ristas and Council member Trinks
Public Comment
Mr. Brad Smith, 23 Ludlow Road, addressed the Council and requested a copy of the letter sent to the State Board of Education requesting authorization to assign costs associated with the Homework Club at Windsor Library and the Tutoring Program at Wilson Library to Town Support for Education. He would also like a copy of the response letter from the State Board of Education denying that request. Mr. Smith publicly thanked Council member Haverstock for bringing Public Comment to the agenda.
Ms. Betsy Kenneson, President of the Board of Education, addressed the Council regarding their receipt of the letter from the Superintendent of Schools to Town Manager Churchill. She reported that the BOE had a unanimous vote to bring the information of the $200,000 savings in benefits to the Council.
Ms. Sandra Isner, 398 Palisado Avenue, a 20-year member of the Hayden Station Fire Company addressed the Council. A letter was sent in January 2001 regarding the conditions of the firehouse. The 1999/2004 Capital Expenditure Projects had the firehouse expansion project on the list, but it was then dropped. Ms. Isner requested that it is added back onto the list or perhaps a study could be performed to determine if the firehouse should be renovated or if a new building is necessary. The station has a septic system and heating system problems. The bays are inadequate; they cannot fit apparatus from the other three firehouses in there. There is no storage or facilities for training. Over the past ten years, there has been an average of three female firefighters, yet the female facilities are inadequate and there are no shower facilities.
Communications from Council Members
Council member Ristas commented on Ms. Isner's request. He said that nothing could be done at this point since they are now voting on the budget tonight. However, he supports it going through the proper committees to address why it was dropped and to get it put back on the list.
Council member Trinks commended the BOE for coming forward last night with their openness about the $200,000 savings in benefits.
Council member Ristas felt that the knowledge that the staff was in the process of negotiations for the benefit savings should have been brought to the Council's attention before yesterday.
4. Budget Workshop
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
$640,000 |
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
$342,940 |
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
$43,043,560 |
|
Motioned by Council member Broxterman to amend the proposed budget of the Board of Education from $43,243,560 to $43,043,560, seconded by Council member Trinks. Motion Passes 5:4:0 (Opposed: Council member Haverstock, Council member Pacino, Council member Ristas and Council member Albano) Motioned by Council member Haverstock to amend the proposed budget of the Board of Education from $43,243,560 to $41,880,368.85, seconded by Council member Albano. Motion Fails 4-5-0 (Opposed: Mayor Hogan, Deputy Mayor Curtis, Council member Broxterman, Council member Simon and Council member Trinks) Comments: Council member Haverstock feels that $41,880,368 would be sufficient to maintain the critical needs of the education budget. He views a 9.5% increase as a number that the residents cannot afford. He has a low degree of confidence that the Superintendent and BOE would spend the amount proposed by Council member Broxterman wisely and effectively, given the recent history of CMT scores and our falling rank in our ERG. It is in his opinion that the BOE Budget has affected the Town's overall spending. He feels that the BOE spending spikes have impacted the ability for Windsor to achieve a better bond rating. One of the reasons (not the only reason) pointed out by a financial analyst that we did not receive a lower bond rating is that school expenditures have been increasing at too rapid a pace even though enrollment has stayed the same. The rating agency showed concern that the Town would not be able to maintain budgetary discipline with this trend. They specifically asked if this trend would level off. For example, staffing has increased over 40% since 1995 and expenditures (not including debt for new buildings) have gone up 30%. These figures do not even include a sizable increase in 2001 and 2002. He believes that the Town Manager said the failure to receive a lower bond rating has increased bonding costs in FY2002. Council member Haverstock has very little confidence that the Superintendent and the BOE will wisely spend the funds. He feels that the answer is to hire more educators, not more middle management. He said that there has to be some accountability and reform for the BOE. He wants measurable goals set for the future. Council member Simon commented on the bond rating based on his recollection of presentations given by the previous Finance Director. Windsor has had the same bond rating for the past 40-50 years and it is a very good bond rating. The fact that we didn't improve our bond rating doesn't cost Windsor any more money. Council member Broxterman commented on the bond rating and the consistent message has been that we have been doing a bad job because we have maintained the same bond rating over the past 40-50 years. The bond ratings are a snapshot in time, they do not take into effect the past or what might happen in the future. There have been some modest increases in student populations. It doesn't take into account the housing population that has increased in the years from 1995-2000. It doesn't determine at what level those students have come into our school systems. The longer a student stays in our school system, the better they perform on the CMTs. In order to build the reputation that we have a good, proactive school system, we have to spend a majority of the budget on the BOE budget. Council member Broxterman asked how, without middle management, could we expect a sole principal to deal with 500 parents, 60-100 staff, plus the rules, forms, and regulations from the State? How are they going to supervise those teachers. Residents have chosen Windsor to raise kids, or they have raised kids and like the climate. Windsor is in competition with towns around us for residents. If we don't have a sound, proactive school system, then we will loose out in that competition and they will move elsewhere. Based on the PTA's and parent's feedback that the increase in the budget addresses some of those fundamental needs for better teachers, better training for teachers, and providing education for our students. Council member Pacino said that we can only hold teachers accountable for so much. He also noted that numbers can be manipulated to make them look good. We have to look at the administration for accountability of the schools. The student scores have stayed the same or gone down since the Superintendent started. He is troubled that the BOE doesn't have a minimum grades standard. The students have to be held accountable, they should not be able to do extracurricular activities with failing grades. We are not getting that leadership that we are searching for in the school system. The salaries and benefits are up to 75% of the school board budget. He can't believe that we are loosing teachers just over money to other school systems. Council member Ristas mentioned that housing values may have improved, but they are still lower than other regions. The school population has grown at a rate less than any other towns. All of this is tied to school performance. Performance has lagged and there has been no accountability. Businesses often take another approach - replace the CEO and don't continue to pour more money into things that don't work. He supports continuing to fund at a level that will operate the system. Without accountability, he is not willing to fund at the high levels requested. Deputy Mayor Curtis commented on the main motion and said that he strongly supports the motion. Accountability and information given by the BOE shows that there is support for the funding requested. The 6.5% indicates that there is no growth for any goals or priorities that the BOE proposed. Contracts composed of 6.25% and goals and priorities for 3.72%. The BOE gave a presentation indicating that there were some strong strides that were being made in terms of growth of students in 4th, 6th, and 8th grade levels incrementally. It is important to have the money for teacher salaries. Our job is to try to retain the teachers, particularly since teachers in neighboring towns are starting to retire. He agrees with Council member Pacino that numbers can be manipulated to make them look good. However, you have to look at the CMT results for students who are new to Windsor vs. students who have been in the Windsor school system. Not every town has the issue of new students to deal with. A recent newspaper article has mentioned minority inner city kids have moved to suburbs. He strongly supports the BOE proposed budget. Council member Pacino reported that when the BOE presented the proposal, the Superintendent came in with a lower increase than the BOE. He finds it difficult to support a budget that came in at 8.1% from the Superintendent and 9.97% from the BOE. He will oppose this budget. Council member Haverstock responded to Deputy Mayor Curtis comments. Council member Haverstock looked at those successes differently: BOE and Superintendent told us that 75% reached efficiency or high efficiency, he saw it as 1 in 4 did not; 68% did, 32% did not, in which he sees that one of three 8th grade students are performing below levels. He is concerned about that. He would have been willing to fund increased spending if there is some accountability with it. Council member Trinks commented that the bond issue is a snapshot, one of several indicators that a bond agency would look at, just as the CMT scores are a snapshot. He asked the BOE last year for other performance indicators, such as the low drop out rate, athletics, students going to college, etc. Granted that the CMT scores are an issue that people look at first, but he believes that the education is more than just scores. He sees that the BOE has initiated a plan and he would like to give them the opportunity to put that plan in place and not change it every two years. He supports the original motion. Council member Ristas supports the motion of $43,043,560. If it passes, they will spend less than what they have initially proposed because of the $200,000 savings in benefits. Council member Broxterman said that these are good times, if people move to Windsor just because of the mil rate or tax levy, we'd have to keep them out. People come here to raise kids. Schools are a central primary issue. This budget addresses some of those areas that we need to work on, specifically goals and priorities. |
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
$3,977,530 |
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
$5,986,275 |
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
$743,820 |
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
$3,781,555 |
|
Motioned by Council member Broxterman to accept the proposed budget of Public Works for $3,781,555 seconded by Deputy Mayor Curtis. Motion Passes 9-0-0 |
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
$383,370 |
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
$1,523,640 |
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$863,760 |
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
$5,266,880 |
|
||
|
||
|
|
Adjusted Amount |
|
|
$25,000 |
Motion Passes 9-0-0 |
||
|
TOTALS: |
|
|
|
|
$69,380,090 |
Break
Mayor Hogan motioned for a break from 8:40 to 8:45 p.m.
Motion Passes 9-0-0
6. Motions for Council to Approve FY 2002 Budget
|
PART A: Appropriations are made for the following specific purposes, the total of which is recommended for approval by the Windsor voters. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board of Education |
|
|
||
|
Motion by: Council member Simon |
Seconded: Council member Trinks |
|||
|
Amount: $43,043,560 |
For: 5 |
Against: 4 Opposed: Council member Albano, Council member Haverstock, Council member Pacino and Council member Ristas |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
Town Support for Education |
|
|
||
|
Motion by: Council member Broxterman |
Seconded: Council member Simon |
|||
|
Amount: $3,977,530 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
Safety Services |
|
|
||
|
Motion by: Council member Trinks |
Seconded: Council member Broxterman |
|||
|
Amount: $5,986,275 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
||
|
Family Services |
|
|
|
|
Motion by: Deputy Mayor Curtis |
Seconded: Council member Broxterman |
||
|
Amount: $1,446,150 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
|
|
Health and Social Services |
|
|
|
|
Motion by: Council member Haverstock |
Seconded: Council member Broxterman |
||
|
Amount: $743,820 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
|
|
Library Services |
|
|
|
|
Motion by: Council member Ristas |
Seconded: Council member Trinks |
||
|
Amount: $1,088,450 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
|
|
Development Services |
|
|
|
|
Motion by: Council member Albano |
Seconded: Council member Broxterman |
||
|
Amount: $1,250,100 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
|
|
Public Works |
|
|
|
|
Motion by: Council member Simon |
Seconded: Council member Trinks |
||
|
Amount: $3,781,555 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
|
|
Information Services |
|
|
|
|
Motion by: Council member Broxterman |
Seconded: Deputy Mayor Curtis |
||
|
Amount: $383,370 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
|
|
Administrative Services |
|
|
|
|
Motion by: Council member Trinks |
Seconded: Deputy Mayor Curtis |
||
|
Amount: $1,523,640 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
|
|
General Government |
|
|
|
|
Motion by: Deputy Mayor Curtis |
Seconded: Council member Trinks |
||
|
Amount: $863,760 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
|
|
General Services |
|
|
|
|
Motion by: Council member Haverstock |
Seconded: Council member Broxterman |
||
|
Amount: $5,266,880 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
|
|
Community Development |
|
|
|
|
Motion by: Council member Ristas |
Seconded: Council member Broxterman |
||
|
Amount: $25,000 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
|
FINAL MOTIONS
Deputy Mayor Curtis made a motion, seconded by Council member Trinks to accept the total General Fund expenditures for the 2001-02 budget in the amount of $69,380,090.
|
The motion passed 5:4:0 Opposing: Council member Albano, Council member Haverstock, Council member Pacino and Council member Ristas |
Council member Trinks made a motion, seconded by Council member Simon, that the annual vote on the budget be held on Tuesday, May 8, 2001 between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. at all 7 polling places.
|
The motion passed 8:1:0 Opposing: Council member Pacino |
PART B:
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
The Town of Windsor operates three self-supporting enterprise funds:
|
Windsor Child Development Center |
|
|
|
|
Motion by: Council member Trinks |
Seconded: Council member Broxterman |
||
|
Amount: $1,010,340 |
For: 8 |
Against: 0 Abstaining: 1 Council member Ristas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caring Connection Adult Day Care Center |
|||
|
Motion by: Council member Trinks |
Seconded: Council member Simon |
||
|
Amount: $435,300 |
For: 8 |
Against: 1 Council member Pacino |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sanitary Landfill |
|
|
|
|
Motion by: Council member Trinks |
Seconded: Deputy Mayor Curtis |
||
|
Amount: $2,940,900 |
For: 9 |
Against: 0 |
|
Comments from Council Members
Council member Ristas requested the mil rate. Mr. Pavitt responded that the mil rate would be 31.2. The average tax increase is $138 for a median priced home of $131,000 (assessed at $91,700). Currently, the tax for a median priced home is $2,723 and with the $138 increase it will be $2,861.
Adjournment
Motioned by Council member Haverstock to adjourn the meeting at 9:06 p.m.
Motion Passes 9-0-0
Respectfully submitted
Kristin Countryman
Substitute Clerk of the Windsor Town Council
cc: Town Clerk
Main Library
Wilson Branch