|
Windsor
Town Council
Council
Chambers – Town Hall
Special
Town Council Meeting
Landfill
Options
December
13, 2004
Present: Mayor Trinks, Deputy Mayor Curtis (arrived
at 8:25 p.m.), Councilor Dean, Councilor Ellingwood,
Councilor Jepsen, Councilor Broxterman, Councilor
Mulligan, Councilor Simon and Councilor Walker
Staff: Peter Souza, Town Manager; Brian Funk,
Director of Public Works; Town Engineer, Tom Lenehan;
Waste Management Manager, Mark Goossens; Risk Manager,
Marty Maynard; Director of Health Services, Charles
Petrillo
Guests: David Hurley, Fuss & O’Neil; Dr. Kevin
Miller, Full & O’Neil; Dr. Gary Ginsberg,
Toxicologist for the CT Department of Public Health;
Dave McCarron, SCS Engineers
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m.
2.
DISCUSSION OF LANDFILL GAS COLLECTION
SYSTEM AND ACCEPTANCE OF GYPSUM
Town staff and outside consultants presented an
update on the gas collection system, odor control
measures and reviewed options relative to accepting
construction and demolition materials and resuming the
allowance of gypsum to be disposed of at the landfill.
Council members then discussed and asked questions of
the staff and consultants.
Councilor Mulligan asked when the State of
Connecticut’s Department of Environmental Protection
would approve the Landfill Closure Plan? The DEP’s
decision regarding the closure and capping of the
Landfill is yet to be determined. The main issues for
the DEP’s consideration include: the material to be
used for capping; soil or a synthetic geomembrane; the
methods for management of the leachate; and the
management of landfill gas.
Councilor Jepsen inquired if the costs of operating
the Landfill beyond 2007 have been included in the pro
forma? Mr. Funk replied that the costs for management
of the landfill as a part of the post-closure process
is included. The pro-forma does not assume operation
of the landfill and the receipt of waste past
12/31/07.
Councilor Jepsen asked if the cost to close the
landfill $27.4 million? The estimate given to the town
in the pro-forma regarding closure costs to close and
cap the landfill, are 13.6 million dollars. The
remainder of the funds are needed to help meet the
30-year post-closure costs.
Councilor Dean asked if the staff will be looking
at "pre-sorted" as an option? We are
reviewing the option of receiving what is being
referred to as "pre-sorted" construction and
demolition debris. This method involves removing
significant quantities of gypsum from the C&D
waste stream prior to its disposal.
Deputy Mayor Curtis asked if the wedge is still
wet? Yes, the wedge area is wet at this point.
Stormwater is draining into the wedge because it is a
low spot on the landfill at this time. Once the wedge
is filled to "grade", that is, to a point
where it is even with or above the area where the
fabric has been placed, then the stormwater will
generally flow over the wedge and drain outside the
areas that waste has been disposed.
Deputy Mayor Curtis asked if there is enough cover
in the wedge for pumps to operate properly? There is
enough waste in place within the wedge to allow the
gas collection wells to operate.
Deputy Mayor Curtis asked if the goal is to still
meet the 2007 closing deadline? Yes it is.
Councilor Dean asked if the fundamental problem or
cause of the odors is the gypsum and if they are sure?
Yes. The "rotten egg" odor is the result of
hydrogen sulfide being generated within the landfill.
This gas is from the decomposition of gypsum in an
oxygen-free or low oxygen environment – which is the
condition underground in certain parts of the
landfill.
Councilor Dean inquired if the odor problem is
fixed or are we just deceiving ourselves? Where the
gas collection system is in place, it is collecting
and combusting the landfill gas prior to it being
emitted into the air. As long as this continues, the
odor problem should be controlled.
Councilor Dean asked if accepting gypsum from only
Windsor and Bloomfield would extend the operating life
beyond 2007? If the gypsum ban was dropped for C&D
coming from the towns of Windsor and Bloomfield, the
pro-forma shows that enough C&D waste would not be
received prior to the end of 2007 to allow the
landfill to reach capacity.
Councilor Dean asked if there are other ways to
meet closure cost other than accepting gypsum?
No option that continues the ban on gypsum would
result in the landfill reaching capacity prior to the
end of 2007. All of these options would lead to less
revenue in the Enterprise Fund by closure. They would
also have an effect on the ability to meet the 30-year
post-closure costs.
Mayor Trinks asked if we can expand MSW into the
wedge? Unfortunately, it cannot be done. Municipal
solid waste (MSW) can be placed into the area of the
"wedge" or the bulky waste cell.
Mayor Trinks asked if there are any health effects
from the odors? Studies have shown that there are no
long-term health effects from landfill odors based on
the level of
constituents
of landfill gases. There are short-term health
effects, such as headaches and nausea, which disappear
when the odor is removed.
Councilor Simon inquired about when you say
"capacity", do you mean per the plan
submitted to the DEP? Yes, the plan reviewed by the
Council, which greatly improves stormwater drainage
off of the landfill, will reduce the generation of
landfill leachate.
Councilor Simon asked if we stay open past 2007,
why would we be losing revenue? Because the longer the
landfill remains in operation, the more annual
operating costs are needed. Such operating costs
reduce the funds available in the Enterprise Fund to
meet closure and post-closure costs.
Councilor Simon asked if the odors were
consistently bad during November. This was due to
digging up wastes to install the gas collection system.
Will you ever be able to promise that there will
be no odors from the Landfill? Not really. However, as
long as the gas collection wells have been installed
in locations where odors are originating, and those
wells are operating as efficiently as designed, the
landfill gas should be collected by the gas collection
system prior to being emitted into the air.
Councilor Mulligan asked what the status is of
installing a permanent flare station? The installation
of additional wells as a part of the "Master
Plan" for gas collection and the location and
specifications for a permanent flare station, will
require the issuance of a permit from the DEP. The
"Master Plan" will be forwarded for the DEP’s
review shortly. The process for approval of a permit
is fully under the control of the DEP and is difficult
to estimate the length of time for the completion of
this process.
Councilor Mulligan asked if plans have begun to
bring permanent power to the blower? This will be part
of the "Master Plan". However, in developing
this plan, we need to consider the longer-term plan to
install a small generator at the landfill to generate
electricity from the combustion of landfill gas. The
shorter-term plan to install an electrical line to
power the blower needs to consider the longer-term
plan which will also require an electrical line to be
installed to carry the power from the generator out to
the electrical grid. It is hoped that one electrical
line could be designed and installed to handle both
needs in the short-term and long-term (which would
save money).
Councilor Mulligan asked if the long-term gas
collection plan would be completed by the end of
January? The plan should be ready for the DEP’s
review in February.
Councilor Mulligan asked what process will be
instituted to step up the size of the blower as the
system is expanded? At this point, the existing blower
equipment will be able to handle the existing system.
The system expansion under the "Master Plan"
will require that a permanent blower/flare station be
installed.
Councilor Mulligan asked if you bring in dirt, why
can’t the landfill be closed in 2007? If soil is
purchased, the landfill could be brought to its final
elevation. However, there would be a cost for such
soil, which would reduce the amount available for
closure and post-closure costs. Contaminated soil
could possibly be brought in (at a tipping fee) to
achieve the same goal, but the town needs to review
the environmental issues from the use of such soil.
Requests to bring contaminated soil to the landfill
for disposal are reviewed for environmental effects by
our consulting engineers.
Deputy Mayor Curtis asked if there is any further
major trenching anticipated?
There should not be any additional trenching unless
additional landfill gas collection piping and wells
are installed.
Councilor Walker said he doesn’t have all the
information he needs to make a decision regarding the
landfill.
Councilor Dean asked if operating costs would go
down when you’re just filling the wedge.
Councilor Mulligan said there are less than 28
wells in the bulky waste area. As this area gets
filled, the well system will have to be expanded
vertically and laterally. Are you accounting for
expansion? Yes.
Vertical extensions will be added to the tops of the
wells as waste is placed around the existing wells.
Additional horizontal collections may be added closer
to the fabric once the existing horizontal collectors
are buried under additional waste.
Councilor Mulligan asked if all the assumptions are
being put into the gas system master plan? Yes.
Mayor Trinks asked what can we charge for
pre-sorted C&D? The pro-forma assumes
approximately $32/ton. This is based on market rates
for where this waste can be disposed of elsewhere.
- PUBLIC COMMENT
- George Yeramian - 739 Prospect Hill Road
- Lisa and Kevin Weiss - 440 Lantern Way
- Tom & Maryellen Gallagher - 415 Lantern Way
- Steve Hawes - 444 Lantern Way
- Pat Terrion - 510 Hearthstone Drive
- Darleen Klase - 511 Hearthstone Drive
Resident Questions
What is Bloomfield seeking in their lawsuit? This
matter is being litigated and we are not in a position
to discuss details at this time.
What is the cost of the gas collection system thus
far? The cost, including operational costs will be about
$650,000.
How many wells are presently installed? How many
wells are planned in the future? There are presently 51
gas collection wells installed – including both
vertical wells and horizontal collectors. The issue of
wells planned for the future will be determined with the
completion of the master plan.
Do you anticipate using the gas as fuel? Yes.
The Landfill Closure costs should be broken out and
detailed.
The core issues underlying the options seem to be
financial. We need to see those numbers and see them in
detail.
Are you presently taking CRRA wastes? Yes, MSW waste.
How will a "fail safe" system at the
Landfill work? Who will be notified? Who will respond?
What type of communication network will this system
have? A "fail-safe" system is usually what we
refer to as an "autodialer". In such a system,
when the relays sense a loss of flame, it will use a
phone line to call out whatever numbers are programmed
into it. It will go down a list of numbers until someone
gets to the site and physically resets it.
Can you project how long H2S will vent before it will
stop? Hydrogen sulfide generation should be reduced by
40% each year.
The information on the web system has been great. I
urge you to continue to update this web site on a
regular basis even if there is nothing new to report.
Is there currently any standing water in the wedge?
Yes.
One citizen voiced his concern about extending
closure since that will also extend liability.
When you say "reach capacity" are you
referring only to the bulky? This refers to the total
capacity of the landfill, both for areas accepting MSW
and areas accepting C&D or bulky wastes.
Why are some landfills banning gypsum? Because of the
odor issue.
Do the "closure costs" calculations include
all the costs? They do, at least as we understand them
at this point. The DEP has several issues to decide on
which will have an effect on the cost of the closure.
Can the gas system properly manage the amounts of
gypsum that you’re projecting? If operating
efficiently, the gas system should collect all gas
generated within the area that the system has been
installed.
One citizen responded that monitoring needs to be
done in the neighborhood.
- ADJOURNMENT
The Special Town Council Meeting was adjourned at
9:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Helene Albert
|